Transkripsi video 3
Bab
1, 1.4. Kalau kita tengok di sini, 1.4 Persoalan kajian dan objektif kajian
1.5. Jadi kita ambil persoalan kajian. Okay. Jadi persoalan kajian dengan
objektif kajian perlulah sejajar. Okay. Perlu sejajar. Kerana ia berkaitan.
Jadi sekarang ini, contoh, kita ambil contoh yang ini. Persoalan kajian. Tengok
beza sini. Mengenal pasti wacana tekstual skrip animasi cerita rakyat Melayu.
Ini objektif dia. Apakah wacana tekstual skrip animasi cerita rakyat Melayu.
Jadi ini kalau misalnya objektif dia dan persoalan dia ini ada satu. Jadi
persoalan dia teruslah. Maknanya kita boleh faham dah. Tapi kalau contohnya “menganalisis
kesan skrip animasi cerita rakyat Melayu dalam kalangan pelajar sekolah”, kita
boleh jadi dua soalan daripada satu objektif iaitu “Sejauh manakah kesan skrip
animasi cerita rakyat Melayu dalam kalangan pelajar sekolah rendah?” “
Bagaimanakah pelajar memberi pendapat menerusi skrip animasi cerita rakyat
Melayu?”. Jadi kedua-dua soalan ini sebenarnya akan menjawab objektif dua. Kena
ingat ya. Apa sahaja dalam objektif ini kita kena persoalkan semula. Sebab kita
nak tahu bahawa sejauh mana kesan itu. Bagaimana cara dia? Jadi itu akan
menjawab objektif ini. Jadi bila kita analisis data ini, memang ini akan
terjawab. Okay. Serupa juga, macam contohnya “ Menghasilkan repertoir perbualan
melalui animasi cerita rakyat Melayu dalam kalangan pelajar sekolah rendah.
Yang ini sebenarnya ada temu bual. Temu bual dalam kalangan pelajar sekolah
rendah tentang skrip animasi tersebut. Jadi, dia bagi pendapat. Jadi, persoalannya
“Sejauh manakah repertoir dibina melalui ini ini ini”. Bagaimana? Dan apakah
cara perbualan? Jadi ini terjawablah dalam tu. Bagaimana. Apakah cara perbualan
dia? Adakah dia cara perbualan dia memang berdua atau bertiga atau berempat.
Ataupun memang dia duduk, dia sorang. Tapi nak kata seorang, dia nak berbual
dengan siapa pula. Okay. Mungkin dengan penyelidik. Soalan ketiga “Apakah
kategori repertoir?” Jadi maknanya dia hasilkan repertoir, ada tiga soalan di
sini. Sejauh manakah? Apakah cara perbualan? Apakah kategori dia? Memang
setelah itu nanti bila kita menganalisis data, memang kita akan dapati akan
terjawablah soalan ketiga-tiga ini. Jadi, bukanlah semestinya, satu objektif,
satu. Boleh juga satu objektif, tiga soalan. Tapi sebenarnya, bila kita
analisis data, memang akan terjawab tiga-tiga soalan ini. Macam yang nombor 2,
analisis kesan skrip animasi akan ada dua persoalan. Bila kita analisis memang
kita jawablah dua soalan ini. Macam itu. Kita dapati bahawa memang kita jawab
dua-dua soalan ini. Bila yang objektif satu “Mengenal pasti wacana tekstual”
memang kita akan ada satu. Contohnya. Boleh juga nak buat dua. Tapi kita
tengoklah cara kita analisis data itu terjawab tak soalan ini. Bila kita buat
analisis, kita tengok balik soalan. Terjawab tak? Jadi bila dah terjawab tu
memang betullah. Jadi, janganlah kita letak semua tiga-tiga objektif atau semua
dua-dua objektif, semua ada satu sahaja soalan. Jadi kita boleh letak dua atau
tiga. Kadang-kadang ada pelajar ada letak sampai empat. Sebab dia nak pastikan
bahawa bila dia analisis data itu, memang terjawab empat-empat soalan tersebut.
Kalau contohnya “Menghasilkan buku panduan penulisan skrip animasi cerita rakyat”.
Contohnya, kalaulah pelajar itu buat ada empat objektif,. Jadi sejauh manakah
buku panduan penulisan skrip animasi cerita rakyat dihasilkan. Apakah cara
untuk menghasilkan buku panduan skrip animasi cerita rakyat? Jadi, yang ini
memang ini akan jadi kebaharuan. Yang nombor ketiga, keempat kebaharuan bagi
awak punya tesis. Benda baharu yang kita nak sebarkan ke seluruh dunia. Jadi
yang ini kita akan ada dua persoalan di sini. Sejauh manakah buku panduan
dihasilkan? Apakah cara dia? Jadi bila buat ini memang kita pastikan bila kita
analisis data, kita pastikan data kita terjawab dua-dua soalan ini. Jadi bila
kita nak tulis, objektif, kita pastikan, kita persoalkan. Apa benda yang kita
akan dapati. Bila kita analisis data nanti. Adakah ini? Adakah itu? Jadi sebab
itulah kita ada beberapa soalan untuk satu objektif. Ini ada dua soalan untuk
satu objektif. Ini ada tiga soalan. Ini ada ini. Tapi soalan dia memang
berkisarkan tentang objektif ini tadi. Tak lari. Tak lari. Tetapi memang ini
sebagai penyelidik yang bagus, memang akan persoalkan supaya nanti bila kita
macam ini “ Dibina repertoir, sejauh mana repertoi dibina?” Lepas itu, apakah
cara perbualan dia. Cara perbualan dia itu kita kena huraikanlah. Apakah
kategori? Sebab kita nak kategorikan repertoir tersebut. Untuk objektif ketiga
ini. Jadi kita pastikan kita jawab semua soalan ini ya. Jadi, pelajar semua,
harap bila kita dah lihat apakah objektif kita, kita pastikan bahawa persoalan
kita itu menjawab soalan. Menjawab melalui objektif kita. Dan kita kena
pastikan bahawa semula saya katakan bahawa apa yang kita analisis akan
terjawablah soalan-soalan yang kita tanya. Pada diri kita. Persoalan ini. Dan
pemeriksa bila dia baca, oh okay. Soalan dia begini, memang saya dapati ada
dalam bab 4. Okay soalan dia begini, okay kita memang dapati bahawa memang
pelajar tulis dalam kategori. Kategori repertoir itu. Dah bagi repertoir.
Bermakna memang tesis ini berjaya. Sebab dia boleh menjawab persoalan daripada
objektif yang telah dia cadangkan untuk tesis dia. Jadi pastikan bahawa, 1.4
persoalan kajian, 1.5 objektif. Perkataan ini. Perkataan ini yang diambil. Ini.
Seperti ini. Mengenal pasti, menganalisis, menghasilkan. Ini ada dalam sini.
Kalau kita dapat lihat, awak kena pastikan bahawa objektif satu yang awak pilih
itu, perlulah dari. Kalau kita lihat di sini. Kejap. Saya ada cadangkan ia di
sini. Cadangan senarai kata kerja. Ini ya. Kata kerja operasional taksonomi
Bloom. Jadi, kita pastikan objektif satu itu rendah. Okay. Kalau C1 itu, dia
rendah. Rendah. Macam tadi mengenal pasti ada ya. Mengenal pasti. Kemudian,
bila objektif 2, kita nak analisis. Kena yang tinggi. Kena kita tinggi. Kita
tengoklah mana yang bersesuai. Kita baca dulu. Yang mana kita bersesuai untuk
objektif kedua. Kalau untuk aplikasi, apa dia. Untuk analisis, apa dia. Ini
kita tadi pilih untuk objektif kedua, analisis. Itu dah tinggi. Dah C4. Maknanya
kita memang analisis, analisis secara mendalam. Secara mendalam. Kemudian, kita
nak letakkan menghasilkan itu. Kita letak C6. Kita nak hasilkan tadi kan. Ingat
tak kita nak hasilkan repertoir atapun kita nak hasilkan buku panduan ke apa
ke. Itu perkataan-perkataan dia. Jadi, ini pastikan bahawa janganlah objektif 1
satu awak ambik C5, awak nak nilai. Tiba-tiba objektif 2 rendah pula. Awak
masuk pula mengenal pasti. Dah salah. Dia mesti daripada kecil, daripada mudah.
Ini dikira mudah. Hinggalah kita naik-naik sehinggalah ke C6. Jadi pastikan
pemilihan perkataan-perkataan ini, yang bersesuaian dengan objektif. Bersesuai.
Dan juga ikut tahap dia. Rendah ke tinggi. Objektif 1 rendah, objektif 2 tinggi
sikit, objektif 3 lagi tinggi. Janganlah objektif satu rendah, objektif 2 awak
letak okay tinggi betul. C6 tadi. Kemudian objektif tiga awak turun pula balik.
Salah. Kena ikut tingkat. Macam kita naik tangga. Rendah, naik, naik. Jadi
ambil daripada sini. Pastikan bahawa perkataan itu bersesuaian dengan objektif
kita. Jadi kena bersesuai. Dan lagi satu. Lagi satu, bila kita tulis objektif
ini. Contoh mengenal pasti. Ada pula pelajar nombor 2 mengenal pasti juga.
Kemudian nombor 3, mengenal pasti lagi. Nombor 4 mengenal pasti. Dah
empat-empat mengenal pasti. Jadi itu tak boleh. Itu semuanya tahap yang rendah.
Tahap yang rendah ini tidak bersesuaian. Asyik nak mengenal pasti saja. Dah
kenapa kan. Kita nak juga analisis. Jadi tak boleh. Jadi macam ini, yang saya
bagi contoh ini kalau dia buat empat objektif. Biasanya objektif ada tiga
sahaja. Kalau ada empat pun, kalau yang ini dia hasilkan repertoir, ini buku
panduan. Ini berbeza. Jadi, bolehlah dia nak tukar. Contohnya menghasilkan.
Jadi dia boleh nak tukar. Kalau kita tengok sini. Ada banyak. Kita ada.
Mengatur, mengkategorikan, menyusun, membangun. Ada banyaklah. Merencana,
merumuskan pun boleh. Kita letak ini merumus. Jadi kalau misalnya ini sudah C6.
Bolehlah C6 ini, C6 yang ini. Jadi boleh rujuk dalam buku ini. Kalau tidak ada
pun boleh rujuk dekat internet. Kalau jumpa. Okay. Pastikan ya. Ingat. Saya
katakan tadi. Saya ulang balik. Pastikan kategori dia daripada rendah, kemudian
tinggi sikit, kemudian tinggi lagi. Okay. Supaya nampak dia punya perbezaan.
Cara kita nak menganalisis data tersebut. Jadi pemilihan perkataan ini amat
penting dalam penulisan objektif kajian.
Video transcription 3
Chapters 1, 1.4. If we look here, 1.4 Research questions
and objectives of study 1.5. So we take the research question. Okay. So the
research questions with the research objectives need to be aligned. Okay. Needs
to be aligned. Because it is related. So now, for example, let's take this
example. Research questions. Look at the difference here. Identifying the
textual discourse animation script Malay folklore. This is her/his objective.
Is animation script textual discourse Malay folklore. So this is if for example,
his/her objective and his/her question there is one. So the question he/she
continues. That means we can understand. But if for example "analyze the
impact of the animation script Malay folklore among elementary school students",
it can be objectives 2, namely the question of "How much effect animation
script Malay folklore among elementary school students?" "How do
students give opinions through animation script Malay folklore?". So these
two questions will actually answer objective 2. Remember. Whatever is in this
objective we have to question again. Because we want to know the extent of the
effect. How is it? So that will answer this objective. So if we analyze this
data, indeed this will be answered. Okay. Similarly, the example of
"Produce repertoire animated conversation through the Malay folklore among
elementary school students. This one is actually an interview. Interviews among
primary school students about the animated script. So, he/she shared his/her
opinion. So, the question is "To what extent is the repertoire built
through this and this". How? And what is the way of conversation? So this
is answered in there. How. How does he/she talk? Is the way he/she talks he/she
is indeed two or three or four. Or indeed he/she is sitting, he/she is alone.
But one person wants to say, he/she wants to talk to someone else. Okay.
Probably with researchers. The third question is "What is the category of
repertoire?" So that means he /she created a repertoire, there are three
questions here. How far? What is the way of conversation? What is it category?
Indeed, after that when we analyze the data, we will find that these three
questions will be answered. So, not necessarily, one objective, one. Can also
be one objective, three questions. But in fact, when we analyze the data, these
three questions will be answered. As in number 2, the analysis of the effects
of the animated script will have two questions. When we analyze, we answer
these two questions. Like that. We find that we do answer these two questions.
When the objective of one is "Identifying textual discourse" we will
have one. For example. Can also make two. But let's look at the way we analyze
the data to answer this question. When we do analysis, we look back at the
question. Did you answer? So when it is answered, it is true. So, let's not put
all three objectives or all two objectives, all there is only one question. So
we can put two or three. Sometimes there are students write up to four. Because
he/she wants to make sure that when he/she analyzes the data, the four
questions are answered. If for example "Produce a guidebook for writing
animated scripts of folk tales". For example, if the student makes four objectives.
So to what extent are folklore animated script writing handbooks produced. What
is the way to produce a folklore animated script guidebook? So, this one is
indeed going to be a novelty. The third number, the fourth novelty for you to
have a thesis. New things we want to spread all over the world. So this one we
will have two questions here. To what extent is the handbook produced? What is
it way? So when we do this we make sure when we analyze the data, we make sure
our data is answered these two questions. So when we want to write, objective,
we make sure, we question. What things will we find. When we analyze the data
later. Is this? Is that? So that is why we have several questions for one
objective. Here are two questions for one objective. Here are three questions.
Here it is. But his/her question really revolves around this objective just
now. Align. Align. But indeed as a good researcher, will indeed question so that
later when we are like this "Built
repertoire, how far is repertoire built?" After
that, what is the way he/she talks. We have to explain the way he/she talks.
What is it category? Because we want to categorize the repertoire. For this
third objective. So we make sure we answer all these questions. So, all
students, please when we have seen what our objectives are, we make sure that
our questions answer the questions. Answer through our objectives. And we have
to make sure that again I say that what we analyze will answer the questions we
ask. On ourselves. This question. And the examiner when he reads, oh okay. His
question is like this, indeed I found it in chapter 4. Okay his question is
like this, okay we did find that indeed students write in categories. The
repertoire category. Already for the repertoire. Meaning this thesis is
successful. Because he can answer questions from the objectives he has proposed
for his thesis. So make sure that, 1.4 research questions, 1.5 objectives. This
word. This word is taken. Here. Like this. Identify, analyze, produce. It's in
here. If we can see, you have to make sure that the objective one you choose,
must be from. If we look here. Wait. I have suggested it here. Suggested verb
list. Here it is. Bloom's taxonomic operational verbs. So, we make sure the
objective one is low. Okay. If it's C1, it's low. Low. Like just identifying.
Identify. Then, when objective 2, we want analysis. It’s high. We have to
choose the high one. Let's see which one fits. We read first. Which fit for the
second objective. If for the application, what is it. For analysis, what is it.
This, we just chose for the second objective, analysis. That's high. Already C4.
That means we are indeed analysis, in-depth analysis. Deeply. Then, we want to put that produce.
Located C6. We want to produce just now, right? Remember we do not want
to produce a repertoire or we want to produce a guidebook to what. Those are
his words. So, this makes sure that you do not have objective 1 with C5, you
have to exam it. Suddenly objective 2 is lower than objective 1. You choose
identify. Wrong. It,s must be from lower level, from simple. This is considered
easy. Until we go up and up all the way to C6. So make sure the selection of
these words, which corresponds to the objective. Suitable. And also follow its
level. Low to high. Objective 1 low, objective 2 slightly higher, objective 3
more high. Don't let objective one be low, objective 2 you place okay high
right. C6 earlier. Then the objective of the three of you goes back down.
Wrong. Must follow the level. Like we went up the stairs. Low, up, up. So take
it from here. Make sure that the word fits our objective. Have to adapt. And
one more. One more thing, when we write this objective. Examples identify.
There are also number 2, students identifying as well. Then number 3, identify
again. Number 4 identifY. The four have identifY. So that can't be. That's all
low level. This low level is not appropriate. It's all to identify. Why? We
also want analysis. So you can't. So like this, I give this example if he makes
four objectives. Usually there are only three objectives. If there are four, if
this one he produced repertoire, this is a guidebook. This is different. So,
let’s change. For example produce. So he/she can change. If we look here. There
are many. We have. Organize, categorize, organize, build. There are many.
Planning, formulating is also possible. We put this formulating. So if for
example this is already C6. Let this C6, this C6. So can refer in this book. If
there is none, you can refer to the internet. Up to you. Okay. Make sure.
Remember. I said earlier. I repeat. Keep it category from low, then a little
high, then high again. Okay. To see that it has a difference. The way we can
analyze the data. So the selection of these words is very important in writing
the objectives of the study.
PAUTAN VIDEO :
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCU5waV0XpmodXKxuKwMs00Q
RUJUKAN:
Normaliza Abd Rahim (2019), Jom Tulis Tesis. Penerbit Universiti Putra Malaysia
No comments:
Post a Comment